Library UniMath.SubstitutionSystems.Lam
**********************************************************
Benedikt Ahrens, Ralph Matthes
SubstitutionSystems
2015
**********************************************************
Contents :
- Specification of an initial morphism of substitution systems from lambda calculus with explicit flattening to lambda calculus
Set Kernel Term Sharing.
Require Import UniMath.Foundations.PartD.
Require Import UniMath.MoreFoundations.Tactics.
Require Import UniMath.CategoryTheory.Core.Categories.
Require Import UniMath.CategoryTheory.Core.Isos.
Require Import UniMath.CategoryTheory.Core.NaturalTransformations.
Require Import UniMath.CategoryTheory.Core.Functors.
Require Import UniMath.CategoryTheory.FunctorCategory.
Require Import UniMath.CategoryTheory.whiskering.
Require Import UniMath.CategoryTheory.limits.binproducts.
Require Import UniMath.CategoryTheory.limits.bincoproducts.
Require Import UniMath.CategoryTheory.limits.terminal.
Require Import UniMath.CategoryTheory.limits.initial.
Require Import UniMath.CategoryTheory.FunctorAlgebras.
Require Import UniMath.CategoryTheory.PointedFunctors.
Require Import UniMath.CategoryTheory.PrecategoryBinProduct.
Require Import UniMath.SubstitutionSystems.Signatures.
Require Import UniMath.CategoryTheory.EndofunctorsMonoidal.
Require Import UniMath.SubstitutionSystems.BinSumOfSignatures.
Require Import UniMath.SubstitutionSystems.SubstitutionSystems.
Require Import UniMath.SubstitutionSystems.LamSignature.
Require Import UniMath.SubstitutionSystems.LiftingInitial.
Require Import UniMath.SubstitutionSystems.MonadsFromSubstitutionSystems.
Require Import UniMath.SubstitutionSystems.Notation.
Local Open Scope subsys.
Local Open Scope cat.
Section Lambda.
Variable C : precategory.
Variable hs : has_homsets C.
The category of endofunctors on C
Local Notation "'EndC'":= ([C, C, hs]) .
Variable terminal : Terminal C.
Variable CC : BinCoproducts C.
Variable CP : BinProducts C.
Local Notation "'EndC'":= ([C, C, hs]) .
Local Notation "'Ptd'" := (precategory_Ptd C hs).
Let hsEndC : has_homsets EndC := functor_category_has_homsets C C hs.
Let CPEndC : BinCoproducts EndC := BinCoproducts_functor_precat _ _ CC hs.
Let EndEndC := [EndC, EndC, hsEndC].
Let CPEndEndC:= BinCoproducts_functor_precat _ _ CPEndC hsEndC: BinCoproducts EndEndC.
Let one : C := @TerminalObject C terminal.
Variable KanExt : ∏ Z : precategory_Ptd C hs,
RightKanExtension.GlobalRightKanExtensionExists C C
(U Z) C hs hs.
Let Lam_S : Signature _ _ _ _ := Lam_Sig C hs terminal CC CP.
Let LamE_S : Signature _ _ _ _ := LamE_Sig C hs terminal CC CP.
Variable Lam_Initial : Initial
(@precategory_FunctorAlg [C, C, hs]
(Id_H C hs CC Lam_S) hsEndC).
Let Lam := InitialObject Lam_Initial.
Variable terminal : Terminal C.
Variable CC : BinCoproducts C.
Variable CP : BinProducts C.
Local Notation "'EndC'":= ([C, C, hs]) .
Local Notation "'Ptd'" := (precategory_Ptd C hs).
Let hsEndC : has_homsets EndC := functor_category_has_homsets C C hs.
Let CPEndC : BinCoproducts EndC := BinCoproducts_functor_precat _ _ CC hs.
Let EndEndC := [EndC, EndC, hsEndC].
Let CPEndEndC:= BinCoproducts_functor_precat _ _ CPEndC hsEndC: BinCoproducts EndEndC.
Let one : C := @TerminalObject C terminal.
Variable KanExt : ∏ Z : precategory_Ptd C hs,
RightKanExtension.GlobalRightKanExtensionExists C C
(U Z) C hs hs.
Let Lam_S : Signature _ _ _ _ := Lam_Sig C hs terminal CC CP.
Let LamE_S : Signature _ _ _ _ := LamE_Sig C hs terminal CC CP.
Variable Lam_Initial : Initial
(@precategory_FunctorAlg [C, C, hs]
(Id_H C hs CC Lam_S) hsEndC).
Let Lam := InitialObject Lam_Initial.
bracket for Lam from the initial hss obtained via theorem 15+
Definition LamHSS_Initial : Initial (hss_precategory CC Lam_S).
Show proof.
apply InitialHSS.
- apply KanExt.
- apply Lam_Initial.
Let LamHSS := InitialObject LamHSS_Initial.- apply KanExt.
- apply Lam_Initial.
extract constructors
Definition Lam_Var : EndC ⟦functor_identity C, `Lam ⟧.
Show proof.
exact (BinCoproductIn1 _ (BinCoproducts_functor_precat _ _ _ _ _ _) · alg_map _ Lam).
Definition Lam_App : [C, C, hs] ⟦ (App_H C hs CP) `Lam , `Lam ⟧.
Show proof.
exact (BinCoproductIn1 _ (BinCoproducts_functor_precat _ _ _ _ _ _) · (BinCoproductIn2 _ (BinCoproducts_functor_precat _ _ _ _ _ _) · alg_map _ Lam)).
Definition Lam_Abs : [C, C, hs] ⟦ (Abs_H C hs terminal CC) `Lam, `Lam ⟧.
Show proof.
exact (BinCoproductIn2 _ (BinCoproducts_functor_precat _ _ _ _ _ _) · (BinCoproductIn2 _ (BinCoproducts_functor_precat _ _ _ _ _ _) · alg_map _ Lam)).
Definition Lam_App_Abs : [C, C, hs]
⟦ (H C hs C hs CC (App_H C hs CP) (Abs_H C hs terminal CC)) `Lam , `Lam ⟧.
Show proof.
exact (BinCoproductIn2 _ (BinCoproducts_functor_precat _ _ _ _ _ _) · alg_map _ Lam).
Definition of a "model" of the flattening arity in pure lambda calculus
Definition Lam_Flatten :
[C, C, hs] ⟦ (Flat_H C hs) `Lam , `Lam ⟧.
Show proof.
exact (fbracket LamHSS (identity _ )).
now get a LamE-algebra
Definition LamE_algebra_on_Lam : FunctorAlg (Id_H _ _ CC LamE_S) hsEndC.
Show proof.
exists ( `Lam).
use (BinCoproductArrow _ (CPEndC _ _ )).
+ exact Lam_Var.
+ use (BinCoproductArrow _ (CPEndC _ _ )).
* apply Lam_App_Abs. * apply Lam_Flatten.
use (BinCoproductArrow _ (CPEndC _ _ )).
+ exact Lam_Var.
+ use (BinCoproductArrow _ (CPEndC _ _ )).
* apply Lam_App_Abs. * apply Lam_Flatten.
Lemma τ_LamE_algebra_on_Lam : τ LamE_algebra_on_Lam =
BinCoproductArrow _ (CPEndC _ _ ) Lam_App_Abs Lam_Flatten.
Show proof.
apply BinCoproductIn2Commutes.
Local Definition bla': (ptd_from_alg_functor CC LamE_S LamE_algebra_on_Lam) --> (ptd_from_alg_functor CC _ Lam).
Show proof.
Local Definition bla'_inv: (ptd_from_alg_functor CC _ Lam) --> (ptd_from_alg_functor CC LamE_S LamE_algebra_on_Lam).
Show proof.
Show proof.
use tpair.
+ apply (nat_trans_id _ ).
+ abstract
(intro c; rewrite id_right
; apply BinCoproductIn1Commutes_left_dir;
apply idpath).
+ apply (nat_trans_id _ ).
+ abstract
(intro c; rewrite id_right
; apply BinCoproductIn1Commutes_left_dir;
apply idpath).
Local Definition bla'_inv: (ptd_from_alg_functor CC _ Lam) --> (ptd_from_alg_functor CC LamE_S LamE_algebra_on_Lam).
Show proof.
use tpair.
+ apply (nat_trans_id _ ).
+ abstract
(intro c; rewrite id_right ;
apply BinCoproductIn1Commutes_right_dir;
apply idpath) .
+ apply (nat_trans_id _ ).
+ abstract
(intro c; rewrite id_right ;
apply BinCoproductIn1Commutes_right_dir;
apply idpath) .
this iso does nothing, but is needed to make the argument to fbracket below well-typed
Local Definition bla : iso (ptd_from_alg_functor CC LamE_S LamE_algebra_on_Lam) (ptd_from_alg_functor CC _ Lam).
Show proof.
Definition fbracket_for_LamE_algebra_on_Lam (Z : Ptd)
(f : Ptd ⟦ Z, ptd_from_alg_functor CC LamE_S LamE_algebra_on_Lam ⟧ ) :
[C, C, hs]
⟦ functor_composite (U Z) `LamE_algebra_on_Lam, `LamE_algebra_on_Lam ⟧ .
Show proof.
Show proof.
unfold iso.
exists bla'.
apply is_iso_from_is_z_iso.
exists bla'_inv.
abstract (
split; [
apply (invmap (eq_ptd_mor _ hs _ _));
apply nat_trans_eq; try (exact hs) ;
intro c ;
apply id_left
|
apply eq_ptd_mor_precat;
apply (invmap (eq_ptd_mor _ hs _ _)) ;
apply nat_trans_eq; try (exact hs) ;
intro c ;
apply id_left ]
).
exists bla'.
apply is_iso_from_is_z_iso.
exists bla'_inv.
abstract (
split; [
apply (invmap (eq_ptd_mor _ hs _ _));
apply nat_trans_eq; try (exact hs) ;
intro c ;
apply id_left
|
apply eq_ptd_mor_precat;
apply (invmap (eq_ptd_mor _ hs _ _)) ;
apply nat_trans_eq; try (exact hs) ;
intro c ;
apply id_left ]
).
Definition fbracket_for_LamE_algebra_on_Lam (Z : Ptd)
(f : Ptd ⟦ Z, ptd_from_alg_functor CC LamE_S LamE_algebra_on_Lam ⟧ ) :
[C, C, hs]
⟦ functor_composite (U Z) `LamE_algebra_on_Lam, `LamE_algebra_on_Lam ⟧ .
Show proof.
exact (fbracket LamHSS (f · bla)).
Main lemma: our "model" for the flatten arity in pure lambda calculus is compatible with substitution
Lemma bracket_property_for_LamE_algebra_on_Lam (Z : Ptd)
(f : Ptd ⟦ Z, ptd_from_alg LamE_algebra_on_Lam ⟧)
:
bracket_property f (fbracket_for_LamE_algebra_on_Lam Z f).
Show proof.
assert (Hyp := pr2 (pr1 (pr2 LamHSS _ (f· bla)))).
apply parts_from_whole in Hyp.
apply whole_from_parts.
split.
-
apply pr1 in Hyp.
apply (maponpaths (λ x, x· #U (inv_from_iso bla))) in Hyp.
rewrite <- functor_comp in Hyp.
rewrite <- assoc in Hyp.
rewrite iso_inv_after_iso in Hyp.
rewrite id_right in Hyp.
eapply pathscomp0. exact Hyp.
clear Hyp.
fold (fbracket LamHSS (f · bla)).
unfold fbracket_for_LamE_algebra_on_Lam.
match goal with |[ |- _· _ · ?h = _ ] =>
assert (idness : h = nat_trans_id _) end.
{ apply nat_trans_eq; try (exact hs).
intro c.
unfold functor_ptd_forget.
apply id_left.
}
rewrite idness. clear idness.
rewrite id_right.
apply nat_trans_eq; try (exact hs).
intro c.
apply cancel_postcomposition.
apply BinCoproductIn1Commutes_right_dir.
apply idpath.
-
destruct Hyp as [_ Hyp2].
fold (fbracket LamHSS (f · bla)) in Hyp2.
unfold fbracket_for_LamE_algebra_on_Lam.
apply nat_trans_eq; try (exact hs).
intro c.
rewrite τ_LamE_algebra_on_Lam.
eapply pathscomp0; [apply cancel_postcomposition ; apply BinCoproductOfArrows_comp | ].
eapply pathscomp0. apply precompWithBinCoproductArrow.
apply pathsinv0.
apply BinCoproductArrowUnique.
+ eapply pathscomp0. apply assoc.
eapply pathscomp0. apply cancel_postcomposition. apply BinCoproductIn1Commutes.
assert (T:= nat_trans_eq_pointwise Hyp2 c).
clear Hyp2.
apply pathsinv0.
assumption.
+ clear Hyp2.
eapply pathscomp0. apply assoc.
eapply pathscomp0. apply cancel_postcomposition. apply BinCoproductIn2Commutes.
unfold Lam_Flatten.
Opaque fbracket.
Opaque LamHSS.
set (X:= f · bla).
assert (TT:=compute_fbracket C hs CC Lam_S LamHSS(Z:=Z)).
simpl in *.
assert (T3 := TT X); clear TT.
unfold X; unfold X in T3; clear X.
rewrite id_left.
rewrite id_left.
rewrite id_left.
Local Notation "⦃ f ⦄" := (fbracket _ f)(at level 0).
set (Tη := ptd_from_alg _ ).
rewrite functor_id.
rewrite functor_id.
rewrite id_right.
destruct Z as [Z e]. simpl in *.
set (T := ` Lam).
assert (T3':= nat_trans_eq_pointwise T3 c).
simpl in *.
match goal with |[ T3' : _ = ?f |- ?a · _ = _ ] => transitivity (a · f) end.
{ apply maponpaths. apply T3'. }
repeat rewrite assoc.
match goal with |[ T3' : _ = ?f |- _ = ?a · ?b · _ · ?d ] => transitivity (a · b · #T f · d) end.
2: { apply cancel_postcomposition. apply maponpaths. apply maponpaths. apply (!T3'). }
clear T3'.
apply pathsinv0.
assert (T3':= nat_trans_eq_pointwise T3 (T (Z c))).
eapply pathscomp0. apply cancel_postcomposition. apply cancel_postcomposition. apply maponpaths. apply T3'.
clear T3'.
apply pathsinv0.
destruct f as [f fptdmor]. simpl in *.
rewrite id_right.
rewrite id_right.
repeat rewrite assoc.
assert (X := fptdmor (T (Z c))). clear T3 fptdmor.
assert (X' := maponpaths (#T) X); clear X.
rewrite functor_comp in X'.
apply pathsinv0.
eapply pathscomp0. apply cancel_postcomposition. apply cancel_postcomposition.
apply cancel_postcomposition. apply X'.
clear X'.
assert (X := Monad_law_2_from_hss _ _ CC Lam_S LamHSS (T (Z c))).
unfold μ_0 in X. unfold μ_2 in X.
match goal with |[ X : ?e = _ |- ?a · ?b · _ · _ = _ ] =>
assert (X' : e = a · b) end.
{ apply cancel_postcomposition. apply maponpaths.
apply pathsinv0, BinCoproductIn1Commutes.
}
rewrite X' in X. clear X'.
eapply pathscomp0. apply cancel_postcomposition. apply cancel_postcomposition. apply X. clear X.
rewrite id_left.
assert (μ_2_nat := nat_trans_ax (μ_2 C hs CC Lam_S LamHSS)).
assert (X := μ_2_nat _ _ (f c)).
unfold μ_2 in X.
eapply pathscomp0. 2: { apply cancel_postcomposition. apply X. }
clear X.
rewrite functor_comp.
repeat rewrite <- assoc.
apply maponpaths.
assert (X := third_monad_law_from_hss _ _ CC Lam_S LamHSS).
assert (X' := nat_trans_eq_pointwise X). clear X.
simpl in X'.
eapply pathscomp0. apply X'.
clear X'. apply cancel_postcomposition. apply id_left.
apply parts_from_whole in Hyp.
apply whole_from_parts.
split.
-
apply pr1 in Hyp.
apply (maponpaths (λ x, x· #U (inv_from_iso bla))) in Hyp.
rewrite <- functor_comp in Hyp.
rewrite <- assoc in Hyp.
rewrite iso_inv_after_iso in Hyp.
rewrite id_right in Hyp.
eapply pathscomp0. exact Hyp.
clear Hyp.
fold (fbracket LamHSS (f · bla)).
unfold fbracket_for_LamE_algebra_on_Lam.
match goal with |[ |- _· _ · ?h = _ ] =>
assert (idness : h = nat_trans_id _) end.
{ apply nat_trans_eq; try (exact hs).
intro c.
unfold functor_ptd_forget.
apply id_left.
}
rewrite idness. clear idness.
rewrite id_right.
apply nat_trans_eq; try (exact hs).
intro c.
apply cancel_postcomposition.
apply BinCoproductIn1Commutes_right_dir.
apply idpath.
-
destruct Hyp as [_ Hyp2].
fold (fbracket LamHSS (f · bla)) in Hyp2.
unfold fbracket_for_LamE_algebra_on_Lam.
apply nat_trans_eq; try (exact hs).
intro c.
rewrite τ_LamE_algebra_on_Lam.
eapply pathscomp0; [apply cancel_postcomposition ; apply BinCoproductOfArrows_comp | ].
eapply pathscomp0. apply precompWithBinCoproductArrow.
apply pathsinv0.
apply BinCoproductArrowUnique.
+ eapply pathscomp0. apply assoc.
eapply pathscomp0. apply cancel_postcomposition. apply BinCoproductIn1Commutes.
assert (T:= nat_trans_eq_pointwise Hyp2 c).
clear Hyp2.
apply pathsinv0.
assumption.
+ clear Hyp2.
eapply pathscomp0. apply assoc.
eapply pathscomp0. apply cancel_postcomposition. apply BinCoproductIn2Commutes.
unfold Lam_Flatten.
Opaque fbracket.
Opaque LamHSS.
set (X:= f · bla).
assert (TT:=compute_fbracket C hs CC Lam_S LamHSS(Z:=Z)).
simpl in *.
assert (T3 := TT X); clear TT.
unfold X; unfold X in T3; clear X.
rewrite id_left.
rewrite id_left.
rewrite id_left.
Local Notation "⦃ f ⦄" := (fbracket _ f)(at level 0).
set (Tη := ptd_from_alg _ ).
rewrite functor_id.
rewrite functor_id.
rewrite id_right.
destruct Z as [Z e]. simpl in *.
set (T := ` Lam).
assert (T3':= nat_trans_eq_pointwise T3 c).
simpl in *.
match goal with |[ T3' : _ = ?f |- ?a · _ = _ ] => transitivity (a · f) end.
{ apply maponpaths. apply T3'. }
repeat rewrite assoc.
match goal with |[ T3' : _ = ?f |- _ = ?a · ?b · _ · ?d ] => transitivity (a · b · #T f · d) end.
2: { apply cancel_postcomposition. apply maponpaths. apply maponpaths. apply (!T3'). }
clear T3'.
apply pathsinv0.
assert (T3':= nat_trans_eq_pointwise T3 (T (Z c))).
eapply pathscomp0. apply cancel_postcomposition. apply cancel_postcomposition. apply maponpaths. apply T3'.
clear T3'.
apply pathsinv0.
destruct f as [f fptdmor]. simpl in *.
rewrite id_right.
rewrite id_right.
repeat rewrite assoc.
assert (X := fptdmor (T (Z c))). clear T3 fptdmor.
assert (X' := maponpaths (#T) X); clear X.
rewrite functor_comp in X'.
apply pathsinv0.
eapply pathscomp0. apply cancel_postcomposition. apply cancel_postcomposition.
apply cancel_postcomposition. apply X'.
clear X'.
assert (X := Monad_law_2_from_hss _ _ CC Lam_S LamHSS (T (Z c))).
unfold μ_0 in X. unfold μ_2 in X.
match goal with |[ X : ?e = _ |- ?a · ?b · _ · _ = _ ] =>
assert (X' : e = a · b) end.
{ apply cancel_postcomposition. apply maponpaths.
apply pathsinv0, BinCoproductIn1Commutes.
}
rewrite X' in X. clear X'.
eapply pathscomp0. apply cancel_postcomposition. apply cancel_postcomposition. apply X. clear X.
rewrite id_left.
assert (μ_2_nat := nat_trans_ax (μ_2 C hs CC Lam_S LamHSS)).
assert (X := μ_2_nat _ _ (f c)).
unfold μ_2 in X.
eapply pathscomp0. 2: { apply cancel_postcomposition. apply X. }
clear X.
rewrite functor_comp.
repeat rewrite <- assoc.
apply maponpaths.
assert (X := third_monad_law_from_hss _ _ CC Lam_S LamHSS).
assert (X' := nat_trans_eq_pointwise X). clear X.
simpl in X'.
eapply pathscomp0. apply X'.
clear X'. apply cancel_postcomposition. apply id_left.
Uniqueness of the bracket operation
That is a consequence of uniqueness of that operation for a larger signature, namely for that of lambda calculus with flattening. We thus only have to extract the relevant parts, which is still a bit cumbersome.Lemma bracket_for_LamE_algebra_on_Lam_unique (Z : Ptd)
(f : Ptd ⟦ Z, ptd_from_alg LamE_algebra_on_Lam ⟧)
:
∏
t : ∑
h : [C, C, hs]
⟦ functor_composite (U Z)
(` LamE_algebra_on_Lam),
`LamE_algebra_on_Lam ⟧,
bracket_property f h,
t =
tpair
(λ h : [C, C, hs]
⟦ functor_composite (U Z)
(` LamE_algebra_on_Lam),
`LamE_algebra_on_Lam ⟧,
bracket_property f h)
(fbracket_for_LamE_algebra_on_Lam Z f) (bracket_property_for_LamE_algebra_on_Lam Z f).
Show proof.
intro t.
apply subtypeEquality.
- intro; apply isaset_nat_trans. apply hs.
- simpl.
destruct t as [t Ht]; simpl.
unfold fbracket_for_LamE_algebra_on_Lam.
apply (fbracket_unique LamHSS).
split.
+ apply parts_from_whole in Ht. destruct Ht as [H1 _].
apply nat_trans_eq; try assumption.
intro c.
assert (HT:=nat_trans_eq_pointwise H1 c).
simpl.
rewrite id_right.
eapply pathscomp0. apply HT.
simpl. repeat rewrite assoc. apply cancel_postcomposition.
apply BinCoproductIn1Commutes.
+ apply parts_from_whole in Ht. destruct Ht as [_ H2].
apply nat_trans_eq; try assumption.
intro c.
assert (HT := nat_trans_eq_pointwise H2 c).
match goal with |[H2 : ?e = ?f |- _ ] =>
assert (X: BinCoproductIn1 _ _ · e = BinCoproductIn1 _ _ · f) end.
{ apply maponpaths . assumption. }
clear HT. clear H2.
match goal with |[X : _ = ?f |- _ ] => transitivity f end.
2: { rewrite τ_LamE_algebra_on_Lam.
eapply pathscomp0. apply assoc.
apply cancel_postcomposition. apply BinCoproductIn1Commutes.
}
match goal with |[X : ?e = _ |- _ ] => transitivity e end.
2: apply X.
rewrite τ_LamE_algebra_on_Lam.
apply pathsinv0.
eapply pathscomp0. apply assoc.
eapply pathscomp0. apply cancel_postcomposition. apply assoc.
eapply pathscomp0. apply cancel_postcomposition. apply cancel_postcomposition.
apply BinCoproductIn1Commutes.
repeat rewrite <- assoc.
eapply pathscomp0. apply maponpaths. apply assoc.
eapply pathscomp0. apply maponpaths. apply cancel_postcomposition. apply BinCoproductIn1Commutes.
eapply pathscomp0. apply maponpaths. apply (!assoc _ _ _ ).
simpl. apply maponpaths. apply maponpaths.
apply BinCoproductIn1Commutes.
apply subtypeEquality.
- intro; apply isaset_nat_trans. apply hs.
- simpl.
destruct t as [t Ht]; simpl.
unfold fbracket_for_LamE_algebra_on_Lam.
apply (fbracket_unique LamHSS).
split.
+ apply parts_from_whole in Ht. destruct Ht as [H1 _].
apply nat_trans_eq; try assumption.
intro c.
assert (HT:=nat_trans_eq_pointwise H1 c).
simpl.
rewrite id_right.
eapply pathscomp0. apply HT.
simpl. repeat rewrite assoc. apply cancel_postcomposition.
apply BinCoproductIn1Commutes.
+ apply parts_from_whole in Ht. destruct Ht as [_ H2].
apply nat_trans_eq; try assumption.
intro c.
assert (HT := nat_trans_eq_pointwise H2 c).
match goal with |[H2 : ?e = ?f |- _ ] =>
assert (X: BinCoproductIn1 _ _ · e = BinCoproductIn1 _ _ · f) end.
{ apply maponpaths . assumption. }
clear HT. clear H2.
match goal with |[X : _ = ?f |- _ ] => transitivity f end.
2: { rewrite τ_LamE_algebra_on_Lam.
eapply pathscomp0. apply assoc.
apply cancel_postcomposition. apply BinCoproductIn1Commutes.
}
match goal with |[X : ?e = _ |- _ ] => transitivity e end.
2: apply X.
rewrite τ_LamE_algebra_on_Lam.
apply pathsinv0.
eapply pathscomp0. apply assoc.
eapply pathscomp0. apply cancel_postcomposition. apply assoc.
eapply pathscomp0. apply cancel_postcomposition. apply cancel_postcomposition.
apply BinCoproductIn1Commutes.
repeat rewrite <- assoc.
eapply pathscomp0. apply maponpaths. apply assoc.
eapply pathscomp0. apply maponpaths. apply cancel_postcomposition. apply BinCoproductIn1Commutes.
eapply pathscomp0. apply maponpaths. apply (!assoc _ _ _ ).
simpl. apply maponpaths. apply maponpaths.
apply BinCoproductIn1Commutes.
Definition bracket_for_LamE_algebra_on_Lam_at (Z : Ptd)
(f : Ptd ⟦ Z, ptd_from_alg LamE_algebra_on_Lam ⟧)
:
bracket_at C hs CC LamE_S LamE_algebra_on_Lam f.
Show proof.
use tpair.
- exists (fbracket_for_LamE_algebra_on_Lam Z f).
apply (bracket_property_for_LamE_algebra_on_Lam Z f).
- simpl; apply bracket_for_LamE_algebra_on_Lam_unique.
- exists (fbracket_for_LamE_algebra_on_Lam Z f).
apply (bracket_property_for_LamE_algebra_on_Lam Z f).
- simpl; apply bracket_for_LamE_algebra_on_Lam_unique.
Definition bracket_for_LamE_algebra_on_Lam : bracket LamE_algebra_on_Lam.
Show proof.
intros Z f.
simpl.
apply bracket_for_LamE_algebra_on_Lam_at.
simpl.
apply bracket_for_LamE_algebra_on_Lam_at.
Definition LamE_model_on_Lam : hss CC LamE_S.
Show proof.
exists LamE_algebra_on_Lam.
exact bracket_for_LamE_algebra_on_Lam.
exact bracket_for_LamE_algebra_on_Lam.
Variable LamE_Initial : Initial
(@precategory_FunctorAlg [C, C, hs]
(Id_H C hs CC LamE_S) hsEndC).
Definition LamEHSS_Initial : Initial (hss_precategory CC LamE_S).
Show proof.
apply InitialHSS.
- apply KanExt.
- apply LamE_Initial.
Let LamEHSS := InitialObject LamEHSS_Initial.- apply KanExt.
- apply LamE_Initial.
Definition FLATTEN : (hss_precategory CC LamE_S) ⟦LamEHSS, LamE_model_on_Lam⟧
:= InitialArrow _ _ .
End Lambda.