Negation (and emptiness). \begin{code} {-# OPTIONS --without-K --exact-split --safe --auto-inline #-} module MLTT.Negation where open import MLTT.Universes open import MLTT.Empty open import MLTT.Id open import MLTT.Pi open import MLTT.Plus open import MLTT.Sigma private _⇔_ : 𝓤 ̇ → 𝓥 ̇ → 𝓤 ⊔ 𝓥 ̇ A ⇔ B = (A → B) × (B → A) ¬_ : 𝓤 ̇ → 𝓤 ̇ ¬ A = A → 𝟘 {𝓤₀} decidable : 𝓤 ̇ → 𝓤 ̇ decidable A = A + ¬ A _≠_ : {X : 𝓤 ̇ } → (x y : X) → 𝓤 ̇ x ≠ y = ¬ (x = y) has-two-distinct-points : 𝓤 ̇ → 𝓤 ̇ has-two-distinct-points X = Σ (x , y) ꞉ X × X , (x ≠ y) has-three-distinct-points : 𝓤 ̇ → 𝓤 ̇ has-three-distinct-points X = Σ (x , y , z) ꞉ X × X × X , (x ≠ y) × (y ≠ z) × (z ≠ x) ≠-sym : {X : 𝓤 ̇ } → {x y : X} → x ≠ y → y ≠ x ≠-sym u r = u (r ⁻¹) is-empty : 𝓤 ̇ → 𝓤 ̇ is-empty = ¬_ ¬¬_ : 𝓤 ̇ → 𝓤 ̇ ¬¬ A = ¬ (¬ A) ¬¬¬_ : 𝓤 ̇ → 𝓤 ̇ ¬¬¬ A = ¬ (¬¬ A) is-nonempty : 𝓤 ̇ → 𝓤 ̇ is-nonempty = ¬¬_ dual : {X : 𝓤 ̇ } {Y : 𝓥 ̇ } (R : 𝓦 ̇ ) → (X → Y) → (Y → R) → (X → R) dual R f p = p ∘ f contrapositive : {A : 𝓤 ̇ } {B : 𝓥 ̇ } → (A → B) → ¬ B → ¬ A contrapositive = dual _ double-contrapositive : {A : 𝓤 ̇ } {B : 𝓥 ̇ } → (A → B) → ¬¬ A → ¬¬ B double-contrapositive = contrapositive ∘ contrapositive ¬¬-functor : {A : 𝓤 ̇ } {B : 𝓥 ̇ } → (A → B) → ¬¬ A → ¬¬ B ¬¬-functor = double-contrapositive ¬¬-kleisli : {A : 𝓤 ̇ } {B : 𝓥 ̇ } → (A → ¬¬ B) → ¬¬ A → ¬¬ B ¬¬-kleisli f ϕ h = ϕ (λ a → f a h) ¬¬-intro : {A : 𝓤 ̇ } → A → ¬¬ A ¬¬-intro x u = u x three-negations-imply-one : {A : 𝓤 ̇ } → ¬¬¬ A → ¬ A three-negations-imply-one = contrapositive ¬¬-intro dne' : {A : 𝓤 ̇ } {B : 𝓥 ̇ } → (A → B) → (¬¬ B → B) → ¬¬ A → B dne' f h ϕ = h (λ g → ϕ (λ a → g (f a))) dne : {A : 𝓤 ̇ } {B : 𝓥 ̇ } → (A → ¬ B) → ¬¬ A → ¬ B dne f ϕ b = ϕ (λ a → f a b) double-negation-unshift : {X : 𝓤 ̇ } {A : X → 𝓥 ̇ } → ¬¬ ((x : X) → A x) → (x : X) → ¬¬ (A x) double-negation-unshift f x g = f (λ h → g (h x)) dnu : {A : 𝓤 ̇ } {B : 𝓥 ̇ } → ¬¬ (A × B) → ¬¬ A × ¬¬ B dnu φ = (¬¬-functor pr₁ φ) , (¬¬-functor pr₂ φ) und : {A : 𝓤 ̇ } {B : 𝓥 ̇ } → ¬¬ A × ¬¬ B → ¬¬ (A × B) und (φ , γ) w = γ (λ y → φ (λ x → w (x , y))) ¬¬-stable : 𝓤 ̇ → 𝓤 ̇ ¬¬-stable A = ¬¬ A → A ¬-is-¬¬-stable : {A : 𝓤 ̇ } → ¬¬-stable (¬ A) ¬-is-¬¬-stable = three-negations-imply-one Π-is-¬¬-stable : {A : 𝓤 ̇ } {B : A → 𝓥 ̇ } → ((a : A) → ¬¬-stable (B a)) → ¬¬-stable (Π B) Π-is-¬¬-stable f ϕ a = f a (λ v → ϕ (λ g → v (g a))) →-is-¬¬-stable : {A : 𝓤 ̇ } {B : 𝓥 ̇ } → ¬¬-stable B → ¬¬-stable (A → B) →-is-¬¬-stable f = Π-is-¬¬-stable (λ _ → f) ×-is-¬¬-stable : {A : 𝓤 ̇ } {B : 𝓥 ̇ } → ¬¬-stable A → ¬¬-stable B → ¬¬-stable (A × B) ×-is-¬¬-stable f g ϕ = f (λ v → ϕ (λ (a , b) → v a)) , g (λ v → ϕ (λ (a , b) → v b)) negation-of-implication : {A : 𝓤 ̇ } {B : 𝓥 ̇ } → ¬ (A → B) → ¬¬ A × ¬ B negation-of-implication u = (λ v → u (λ a → 𝟘-elim (v a))) , (λ b → u (λ a → b)) negation-of-implication-converse : {A : 𝓤 ̇ } {B : 𝓥 ̇ } → ¬¬ A × ¬ B → ¬ (A → B) negation-of-implication-converse (u , v) f = u (λ a → v (f a)) Double-negation-of-implication← : {A : 𝓤 ̇ } {B : 𝓥 ̇ } {R : 𝓦 ̇ } {S : 𝓣 ̇ } {T : 𝓣' ̇ } → (((A → B) → T) → S) → (((A → S) → R) × (B → T)) → R Double-negation-of-implication← f g = pr₁ g (λ a → f (λ h → pr₂ g (h a))) Double-negation-of-implication→ : {A : 𝓤 ̇ } {B : 𝓥 ̇ } (R : 𝓦 ̇ ) {S : 𝓣 ̇ } {T : 𝓣' ̇ } {U : 𝓣' ̇ } → (S → B) → ((((A → S) → T) × (B → T)) → U) → ((A → B) → T) → U Double-negation-of-implication→ R k f g = f ((λ h → g (λ a → k (h a))) , (λ b → g (λ a → b))) double-negation-of-implication← : {A : 𝓤 ̇ } {B : 𝓥 ̇ } → ¬¬ (A → B) → ¬ (¬¬ A × ¬ B) double-negation-of-implication← = Double-negation-of-implication← double-negation-of-implication→ : {A : 𝓤 ̇ } {B : 𝓥 ̇ } → ¬ (¬¬ A × ¬ B) → ¬¬ (A → B) double-negation-of-implication→ f g = Double-negation-of-implication→ (𝟘 {𝓤₀}) 𝟘-elim f g not-Σ-implies-Π-not : {X : 𝓤 ̇ } {A : X → 𝓥 ̇ } → ¬ (Σ x ꞉ X , A x) → (x : X) → ¬ (A x) not-Σ-implies-Π-not = curry Π-not-implies-not-Σ : {X : 𝓤 ̇ } {A : X → 𝓥 ̇ } → ((x : X) → ¬ (A x)) → ¬ (Σ x ꞉ X , A x) Π-not-implies-not-Σ = uncurry Π-implies-not-Σ-not : {X : 𝓤 ̇ } {A : X → 𝓥 ̇ } → ((x : X) → A x) → ¬ (Σ x ꞉ X , ¬ (A x)) Π-implies-not-Σ-not f (x , ν) = ν (f x) not-Π-not-not-implies-not-not-Σ-not : {X : 𝓤 ̇ } {A : X → 𝓥 ̇ } → ¬ ((x : X) → ¬¬ (A x)) → ¬¬ (Σ x ꞉ X , ¬ (A x)) not-Π-not-not-implies-not-not-Σ-not = contrapositive not-Σ-implies-Π-not not-Π-implies-not-not-Σ : {X : 𝓤 ̇ } {A : X → 𝓥 ̇ } → ((x : X) → ¬¬-stable (A x)) → ¬ ((x : X) → A x) → ¬¬ (Σ x ꞉ X , ¬ (A x)) not-Π-implies-not-not-Σ f g h = g (λ x → f x (λ u → h (x , u))) \end{code} Notation to try to make proofs readable: \begin{code} contradiction : 𝓤₀ ̇ contradiction = 𝟘 have_which-is-impossible-by_ : {A : 𝓤 ̇ } {B : 𝓦 ̇ } → A → (A → 𝟘 {𝓤₀}) → B have a which-is-impossible-by ν = 𝟘-elim (ν a) have_which-contradicts_ : {A : 𝓤 ̇ } {B : 𝓦 ̇ } → (A → 𝟘 {𝓤₀}) → A → B have ν which-contradicts a = 𝟘-elim (ν a) \end{code} Fixities: \begin{code} infix 50 ¬_ infix 50 ¬¬_ infix 50 ¬¬¬_ infix 0 _≠_ \end{code}